Print problems and digital debacles
Having a gaffe splashed across the print press has long been most businesses’ worst nightmare, but in the digital age news travels even faster. According to the QCA study, many companies still believe that negative coverage in traditional media is the biggest risk to their reputation: 21% said they fear the effects of negative press in newspapers, radio and television, while only 17% are similarly wary of the power of the internet.
The shareable nature of social media raises many good examples of the importance of online reputation management. Tweets and Facebook posts can spread at lightning speed – which, if the tweet in question is a negative appraisal of your brand, can be a disaster. Not even the Oxford English Dictionary was safe this week: after
a Twitter user pointed out the potential misogyny in some of its definitions, the dictionary’s social media executives responded flippantly then aggressively, provoking a storm of disapproval and a flurry of newspaper articles within hours of the original tweet. By the time the OED apologised for its response, the damage was done.
Fortunately, the fast-burning nature of Facebook and Twitter can be a positive attribute where reputation management is concerned, as embarrassing incidents can be overcome quickly – speedy reactions and effective social media management can help to quell a crisis as quickly as it appears.
Search engines, too, can be a company’s worst enemy as well as its best friend – many a business has Googled themselves only to find an article they’d rather forget about glued to the top of the search results. These too can be addressed with good
PR and
SEO support: search results are infinitely flexible, and the introduction of Google’s ‘right to be forgotten’ function allows individuals to ask for old or inaccurate search results to be removed – though this just makes coverage harder to find rather than removing it altogether.