When it comes to quality content, you probably know more than you think
Branded3’s Tim Grice took on a heroic task to prepare for his talk: reading all 146 pages of Google’s Search Quality Rating guidelines so we didn’t have to. In his session, he took us through the guidelines used by Google’s 4,500 quality raters to assess the quality of website content in terms of expertise, authority and trustworthiness, and discussed how these can then be used to decide whether a site should be rewarded (with improved rankings and search visibility) or penalised (by having its visibility stripped).
Tim’s insights were fascinating from both a writer’s and a digital marketer’s perspective. Many of Google’s markers for content quality – that topical information is more valuable than thin, basic content, for example – seem obvious points at first glance, but enough businesses have suffered from having their search visibility stripped to know that, perhaps, their content could be better.
In essence, Tim’s point was that all content should add value to, or enhance the purpose of, a website. If it doesn’t, it’s doing no one any favours – and could, in fact, be doing it harm.